Community Based Forest Management Strategies and Projections In KPH XIX Saka South Oku, South Sumatera

Authors

  • Enda Kartika Sari Doctoral Student of Environmental Science, Postgraduate Sriwijaya University Faculty of Engineering and Computers Baturaja University Indonesia
  • Andy Mulyana Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya University Indonesia
  • Mirza Antoni Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya University
  • Dessy Adriani Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Sriwijaya University Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22135/sje.2022.7.3.129-135

Abstract

In accordance with the mandate of the law, forests are part state-controlled and must be managed sustainably, for that the existence of KPH is a necessity for all parties. Forest management is generally realized based on forest governance, management plans, forest rehabilitation, forest protection, and conservation. To improve people's welfare, it is necessary to make optimal use of forest areas to support the preservation of natural resources and overcome global climate change. This research was carried out in KPH Unit XIX Saka, South OKU Regency which is located in the forest group of HL Saka, HPT Saka, and HP Saka, South OKU Regency. Data presentation was carried out descriptively and analyzed using the SWOT method. The results of the study show that KPH as a forest area manager at the site level can guarantee the continuity of forest area functions by implementing sustainable forest management with forest ecological values, based on community welfare. The strategy adopted is the SO Strategy, namely by utilizing and promoting the potential of forest resources, especially non-timber forest product resources (HHBK), and the potential for forest environmental services in the KPH.

Keywords:

Forest Management, Projection, Forest Management Unit, Community Based

References

M. Roberts, C. A. Gilligan, A. Kleczkowski, N. Hanley, A. E. Whalley, and J. R. Healey, “The Effect of Forest Management Options on Forest Resilience to Pathogens,†Front. For. Glob. Chang., vol. 3, no. February, 2020, doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00007.

Y. S. Kim et al., “Indonesia’s Forest Management Units: Effective intermediaries in REDD+ implementation?,†For. Policy Econ., vol. 62, pp. 69–77, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.09.004.

A. Juutinen et al., “Forest owners’ preferences for contract-based management to enhance environmental values versus timber production,†For. Policy Econ., vol. 132, no. March, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102587.

M. A. Shaleh, “Perspective on Forest Management,†ICR J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 214–229, 2017, doi: 10.52282/icr.v8i2.196.

C. Kusmana, “Forest resources and forestry in Indonesia,†Forest Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 155–160, 2011, doi: 10.1080/21580103.2011.625241.

U. Paudel, S. R. Adhikari, and K. P. Pant, “Economics of environmental effects on health: A methodological review based on epidemiological information,†Environ. Sustain. Indic., vol. 5, no. December 2019, p. 100020, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2020.100020.

L. Nerfa, J. M. Rhemtulla, and H. Zerriffi, “Forest dependence is more than forest income: Development of a new index of forest product collection and livelihood resources,†World Dev., vol. 125, p. 104689, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104689.

T. T. Gatiso, “Households’ dependence on community forest and their contribution to participatory forest management: evidence from rural Ethiopia,†Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 181–197, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10668-017-0029-3.

T. H. Luong, “Forest resources and forestry in Vietnam,†J. Vietnamese Environ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 171–177, 2014, doi: 10.13141/jve.vol6.no2.pp171-177.

J. S. Bae, Y. Kim, and S. M. Lee, Opportunities for implementing REDD + to enhance sustainable forest management and improve livelihoods in Lombok , NTB , Indonesia. .

K. G. MacDicken, “Global Forest Resources

Assessment 2015: What, why and how?,†For. Ecol. Manage., vol. 352, pp. 3–8, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.006.

D. Morales-Hidalgo, S. N. Oswalt, and E. Somanathan, “Status and trends in global primary forest, protected areas, and areas designated for conservation of biodiversity from the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015,†For. Ecol. Manage., vol. 352, pp. 68–77, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.011.

M. A. Wulder et al., “Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review,†Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 121, pp. 196–209, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.001.

R. d’Annunzio, M. Sandker, Y. Finegold, and Z. Min, “Projecting global forest area towards 2030,†For. Ecol. Manage., vol. 352, pp. 124–133, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.014.

S. Mizaras and D. Lukmine, “Forest and society’s welfare: Impact assessment in Lithuania,†Sustain., vol. 13, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13105598.

M. Riniarti and A. Setiawan, “Status Kesuburan Tanah Pada Dua Tutupan Lahan Di Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Lindung (Kphl) Batutegi Lampung,†J. Sylva Lestari, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 99, 2014, doi: 10.23960/jsl2299-104.

O. Onrizal and M. Mansor, “Forest conservation and management practices in Minangkabau Society: Forbidden Forest,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1542, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1542/1/012062.

L. Dorji, E. L. Webb, and G. P. Shivakoti, “Forest property rights under nationalized forest management in Bhutan,†Environ. Conserv., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2006, doi: 10.1017/S0376892906002979.

K. T. Nura and F. S. Endris, “Assessment of Levels of Community Awareness to Effects of Forest Degradation and their Environmental Management Practices in Jimma Zone, South western Ethiopia,†Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 212, 2020, doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v7i2.1501.

F. Schwaiger, W. Poschenrieder, P. Biber, and H. Pretzsch, “Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management,†Ecosyst. Serv., vol. 39, no. July, p. 100993, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100993.

Downloads

Published

12/22/2022

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2022): SOCIAL AND ENVIROMENTAL HEALTH

Section

Articles

License

The initial copyright of a paper is held by the authors (or their employer, in some instances). When publishing that paper the copyright may continue to be held by the author, or can be licensed or transferred to the publisher.

DOAJ recommends that journals allow authors to retain the copyright of their papers without restrictions. Authors will then grant the publisher the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights.

Even when the author retains copyright, restrictions may sometimes be imposed by the publisher:

  • The publisher requires exclusive publishing rights. This means that the author no longer holds copyright without restrictions.
  • The publisher requires a transfer or exclusive license of commercial rights. This means the author no longer holds copyright without restrictions.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not previously been published (except as part of a thesis, report, or abstract); that it is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere; and that its publication has been approved by all co-authors.

We need publishing rights from you in order to publish and make available an article. As a result, we require authors who publish in Sriwijaya journal of Environment to sign an author contract, which grants us the necessary publishing rights. This will occur after your manuscript has been peer-reviewed, accepted, and moved into production. Our Production team will then send you an email with all of the details. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/