The relationship of community livelihoods in and around forest reserve areas to forest resources in Humbanghasundutan District of North Sumatra Province

Taufik Taufik, Sulistyowati Diah Kusumawardhani

Abstract


Forest resource management needs to pay attention to the relationship between the community and forest resources.  The conversion of forest land into non-forest areas affects the livelihoods of communities around the forest itself; therefore, knowledge of the socio-economic and cultural interrelatedness of communities in and around forest areas is needed so that the sustainability of forest resources and community livelihoods is maintained.  This study was an explorative one. The data were obtained based on questionnaires and interviews. The respondents were selected purposely considering the characteristics of the research area.  The data analysis was presented using descriptive method. The observed factors were in the form of land history, land tenure and livelihoods originating from the forest area.  This study showed that the historical and customary norms were related to the conversion of forest land to other land uses. The interrelatedness of the community and the forest area was the provision of forest products, namely rubber latex, incense resin, cinnamon bark, firewood, bananas, durian, salak (Salacca Zalacca L.), jengkol (Archidendron pauciflorum L.) and petai (Parkia speciosa L.).  Most of the people were not aware of the existence of forest areas legally designated by the government.   Consequently, although most respondents did not know the existence of the forest areas legally, they were closely related to forest areas in the form of intensive use of forest products. The history and customary norms prevailing in the community were factors related to the conversion of forest land functions.


Keywords


forest, land tenure, livelihood

Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References


J. Miettinen, H. J. Stibig, and F. Achard, “Remote sensing of forest degradation in Southeast Asia-Aiming for a regional view through 5-30 m satellite data,” Glob. Ecol. Conserv., vol. 2, pp. 24–36, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.07.007.

A. Hailu, S. Mammo, and M. Kidane, “Dynamics of land use, land cover change trend and its drivers in Jimma Geneti District, Western Ethiopia,” Land use policy, vol. 99, no. August, p. 105011, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105011.

D. Qian, Y. Du, Q. Li, X. Guo, B. Fan, and G. Cao, “Impacts of alpine shrub-meadow degradation on its ecosystem services and spatial patterns in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 135, p. 108541, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108541.

L. de Jong, S. De Bruin, J. Knoop, and J. van Vliet, “Understanding land-use change conflict: a systematic review of case studies,” J. Land Use Sci., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 223–239, 2021, doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2021.1933226.

K. Krul, P. Ho, and X. Yang, “Land titling as a conflict remedy or driver? Analyzing institutional outcomes through latent and manifest conflicts in China’s forest sector,” Land use policy, vol. 100, no. December 2019, p. 104880, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104880.

V. Perović et al., “Major drivers of land degradation risk in Western Serbia: Current trends and future scenarios,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 123, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107377.

M. Pasgaard and T. F. Nielsen, “A story of ‘communities’: boundaries, geographical composition and social coherence in a forest conservation project, Northern Cambodia,” Geogr. Tidsskr. - Danish J. Geogr. , vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 134–146, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00167223.2016.1182440.

A. Vargas, A. Y. Lo, N. Rohde, and M. Howes, “Background inequality and differential participation in deliberative valuation: Lessons from small-group discussions on forest conservation in Colombia,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 129, pp. 104–111, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.009.

K. T. Soe and Y. O. U. N. Yeo-Chang, “Perceptions of forest-dependent communities toward participation in forest conservation: A case study in Bago Yoma, South-Central Myanmar,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 100, no. November 2018, pp. 129–141, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.009.

M. Nasir Tamalene, M. Henie, I. Al Muhdhar, E. Suarsini, and F. Rochman, “The Practice of Local Wisdom of Tobelo Dalam (Togutil) Tribal Community in Forest Conservation in Halmahera, Indonesia,” Int. J. Plant Res., vol. 2014, no. 4A, pp. 1–7, 2014, doi: 10.5923/s.plant.201401.01.

K. V. Pawar and R. V. Rothkar, “Forest Conservation & Environmental Awareness,” Procedia Earth Planet. Sci., vol. 11, pp. 212–215, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.proeps.2015.06.027.

C. Ashley and S. Maxwell, “Rethinking rural development,” For. Trees Livelihoods, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 155–161, 2002, doi: 10.1080/14728028.2002.9752420.

K. T. Soe and Y. Yeo-Chang, “Livelihood dependency on non-timber forest products: Implications for REDD+,” Forests, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1–25, 2019, doi: 10.3390/f10050427.

M. Jannat, M. K. Hossain, and M. Main, “Socioeconomic factors that favour forest conservation reducing forest dependency of local communities in developing countries : Lesson learnt from the Rangamati hill district in Bangladesh,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2020.

S. Adhikari, T. Kingi, and S. Ganesh, “Incentives for community participation in the governance and management of common property resources: The case of community forest management in Nepal,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 44, pp. 1–9, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.003.

M. A. K. Sahide, S. Supratman, A. Maryudi, Y.-S. Kim, and L. Giessen, “Decentralisation policy as recentralisation strategy: forest management units and community forestry in Indonesia 1 Politique de décentralisation comme stratégie de recentralisation: unités de gestion forestière et foresterie communautaire en Indonésie,” Int. For. Rev., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 2016, 2016.

H. Kaskoyo, A. J. Mohammed, and M. Inoue, “Impact of community forest program in protection forest on livelihood outcomes: A case study of Lampung Province, Indonesia,” J. Sustain. For., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 250–263, 2017, doi: 10.1080/10549811.2017.1296774.

J. E. Fa et al., “Importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for the conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes,” Front. Ecol. Environ., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 135–140, 2020, doi: 10.1002/fee.2148.

D. Saha and S. Agarwalla, “People’s Forest Dependence: A Case Study of Similipal Biosphere Reserve, India,” Rev. Dev. Chang., p. 097226612199826, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0972266121998269.

J. H. Lawler and R. C. L. Bullock, “A case for indigenous community forestry,” J. For., vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 117–125, 2017, doi: 10.5849/jof.16-038.

C. Whitlock, D. Colombaroli, M. Conedera, and W. Tinner, “Land-use history as a guide for forest conservation and management,” Conserv. Biol., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 84–97, 2018, doi: 10.1111/cobi.12960.

B. C. Thiede and C. Gray, “Characterizing the indigenous forest peoples of Latin America: Results from census data,” World Dev., vol. 125, p. 104685, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104685.

W. N. Aye, Y. Wen, K. Marin, S. Thapa, and A. W. Tun, “Contribution of mangrove forest to the livelihood of local communities in Ayeyarwaddy Region, Myanmar,” Forests, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: 10.3390/f10050414.

R. J. Keenan, “Climate change impacts and adaptation in forest management: a review,” Ann. For. Sci., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 145–167, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s13595-014-0446-5.

G. E. Frey, S. Charnley, and J. Makala, “Economic viability of community-based forest management for certified timber production in southeastern Tanzania,” World Dev., vol. 144, p. 105491, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105491.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22135/sje.2023.8.3.142-149

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Sriwijaya Journal of Environment

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.