Study on The Quality of Environmental Impact Assessment Documents Evaluated by EIA Assessment Commission of South Sumatra Province for Preventing Environmental Degradation

Rian Syafni, Dedik Budidanta, Moh Rasyid Ridho

Abstract


The quality Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) document does not absolutely guarantee effectiveness of EIA implementation, but it can be the main basis in environmental management and monitoring. So it is very necessary to evaluate the quality of the EIA Document. This research aims to evaluate the quality of the EIA document assessed by the South Sumatra Province EIA Assessment Commission and appraise the compliance of the person in charge of the business and/or activity in implementing the EIA Document. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The sample is taken using total sampling technique (12 EIA Documents that have been assessed between 2018-2020 and already have an Environmental Feasibility).  The result of the consistency test showed that  42% is very good, 50 % is good and 8% is bad. All the EIA Documents own very good necessity aspect. The results of the relevance test showed that 58% is very good and 42% is  good. Based on the follow-up test of the EIA document, there are 16.7% of the evaluated documents implemented since 2019 and 8% of the documents have been implemented since 2020, but has not complied with the fulfillment of the obligations contained in the Environmental Permit.



Keywords


consistency, necessity, relevance, implementation, EIA

Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References


Arts J., Runhaar H. C., Fischer T. B., Thakur U. J., Laerhoven F. V., Driessen P. P. J., Onyango A., 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: Reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 14 (4).

Bragagnolo C., Lemos C., Ladle R. J., Pellin A., 2017. Streamlining or sidestepping? Political pressure to revise environmental licensing and EIA in Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 86-90.

Catherina Y. L., 2003. Evaluasi Dokumen AMDAL. [Tesis]. Jakarta : Universitas Indonesia

Chang T., Nielsen E., Auberle W., Solop I. F., 2013. A quantitative method to analyze the quality of EIA information in wind energy development and avian/bat assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 38 : 142-150.

Haryono, W. S., 2015. Pelaksanaan Izin Lingkungan oleh Kegiatan Wajib AMDAL atau Wajib UKL-UPL.

Hermawan E., M.R. Ridho, M. Yazid. 2020. Production Area (Concessions) Role on Landscape Environment Management in South Sumatra. Sriwijaya Journal of Environment 5 (3), 151-155.

Hermawan E., M.R. Ridho, M. Yazid. 2019. Effectivity and efficiency of environmental management and monitoring by private sector (EEEMMPS) in South Sumatera. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol: 399 issue: 1. Conference Proceedin

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2012. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 16 tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Dokumen Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta: KLH.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2013. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 8 tahun 2013 tentang Tata laksana penilaian dan pemeriksaan dokumen lingkungan hidup serta penerbitan izin lingkungan. Jakarta: KLH.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, 2018. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor P.26/MENLHK/SETJEN/ KUM.1/7/2018 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan dan Penilaian serta Pemeriksaan Dokumen Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Perizinan Berusaha Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik. Jakarta: KLHK.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, 2019. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor P.38/MENLHK/SETJEN/ KUM.1/7/2019 tentang Jenis Rencana Usaha dan/atau Kegiatan yang Wajib Memiliki Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta: KLHK.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, 2019. Evaluasi Kinerja Komisi Penilai AMDAL. Jakarta: KLHK.

Kolhoff A. J., Driessen P. P. J, Runhaar H. A. C., 2013. An Analysis Framework For Characterizing and Explaining Development of EIA Legislation in Developing Countries-Illustrated for Georgia, Ghana and Yemen. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 38: 1–15.

Masri R. M., 2016. Evaluasi Amdal Pembangunan Gedung 10 Lantai Di Pusat Kota Bandung. Jurnal Media Teknik Sipil. 14 (2): 191.

Momtaz, S., 2002. Environmental impact assessment in Bangladesh : A critical review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 22 (2): 163-179.

Morgan R. K., 2012. Environmental Impact Assessment: The State of The Art’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 30 (1):5-14.

Nelson A. and Chomitz KM. 2011. Effectiveness of Strict vs. Multiple Use Protected Areas in Reducing Tropical Forest Fires: A Global Analysis Using Matching Methods. PLoS ONE. 6(8).

Sari I., 2018. AMDAL Sebagai Instrumen Dalam Mempertahankan Sustainable Development Yang Berwawasan Lingkungan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara. 8 (2): 59-79.

Sugiyono., 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuatitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Venita R., Effendi H., Wijayanto H., 2015. Analisis Mutu dan Kriteria Kelayakan Dokumen AMDAL di Kabupaten Bogor dan Kota Bogor. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. 5(1):7-16.

Wagner I., and Suteki S., 2019. Independensi Penilaian Amdal Sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Terhadap Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1 (3): 404.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22135/sje.2021.6.3.121-126

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Sriwijaya Journal of Environment